The manager of a Mississippi professional office relies on a basic management practice when she presents any new policy. “I make it a win-win situation,” says Beth C. Pharr. “I tell staff ‘this why it’s necessary, and this is how it benefits you.’”
Such was the case when she set a policy to solve a problem common to almost every office: personal Internet use. To introduce it in a win-win light, she explained it from the office’s standpoint: that it was necessary to protect against privacy violations as well as to prevent losses in productivity—and revenue. Then she explained it from staff’s standpoint: that it was necessary to protect their own personal data. What staff hadn’t realized, she says, was that because the office uses an Internet-based server, any financial information they submit is kept offsite, and an employee at the server company “could capture bank account information and absolutely ruin someone.”
She also pointed out that an employer has both the right and duty to monitor what is sent via its system to protect against legal violations. Her advice: “if you don’t want your mother to read your message on the front page of the local paper, don’t send it.”
To open the discussion, she asked different staffers how much time they spent on the Internet each week. Estimates were low. But her own monitor, which tracks each person’s use, showed otherwise. She told staff “something is not right here, because my monitor says you spent X amount of time.”
The time loss wasn’t intentional, she says. People don’t realize how much time they lose to Internet use—or how expensive it is. She estimates her office loses $18.50 for every 15 minutes somebody spends on the Internet. With 11 staffers, that comes to $203.50 a day—$1,017.50 a month—$12,210 a year. And 15 minutes is a low estimate, she says. Actual loss is closer to $500 a day.
Added to that is lost productivity. Her office was paying overtime for hours spent on personal Internet use.
Under the new policy, staff cannot use the office’s computer or Internet connections for nonbusiness reasons, whether during working hours or not and whether onsite or off. That usage includes personal use, social media, commercial advertising, solicitation, and promotion. Neither can anybody violate software licensing, or install software without written permission.
The ban on solicitation, she explains, prevents employees looking for other work during office time. The ban on promotion prevents going to a dating site, because that is personal promotion.
Staff sign the policy, including a statement that failure to honor it can result in discipline “as well as legal action for damages” the office might suffer as a result.
To support the policy, Pharr has blocked most general access, including social media such as Facebook and Twitter. The only things staff are able to search are items directly related to business.
There is, however, a little leeway, and access is granted to a few general interest sites such as the weather. Anybody who needs access to another site has to ask Pharr to unblock it. And her response is always “tell me why you need it.” Access is then given on a case-by-case situation.
For personal use, such as bill paying, Pharr has set up a “community terminal” in a private cubicle that staff can use during their off time. But there, too, the rule is that they cannot go to social media sites. And they are aware that they use it at their own risk, “because there is no privacy when the information goes through somebody else’s network.”
Law Office Manager wants to send you $100. Tell us how you solved a problem or implemented a successful program, or share any idea we can use in our Reader Tips column and we’ll send you $100. Contact catherine@plainlanguagemedia.com.
Related reading:
An ever changing policy on using social media
Model Tool: Privacy risk assessment
8 pitfalls of letting law firm employees work from home